Benchmark

Back to search

Project overview and project results


Project BB fietsroute/ cycling route Leidsche Rijn-Papendorp Duration 2014-07-13not available
Customer (project initiator) show_help Gemeente Utrecht Location Utrecht
Organisation show_help Gemeente Utrecht Total Budget show_help not known
Evaluation Design show_help One group before/after Target Group show_help not available
Type of Project show_help Single measure(s) Emission effect show_help not available
Links not available Downloads MNBB71_Fietsroute_Leidsche_Rijn_-_Papendorp_eindevaluatie.pdf

Overall Project Description show_help

Construction of a new cycling route between residential area Leidsche Rijn and office park Papendorp. The route is 1 km shorter and shortens travel time by bike with 4-5 minutes. The route is a part of the future cycling speedway Harmelen-Utrecht.

Description of the system effects show_help

49% has chosen a new cycling route; 30% hardly altered its cycling route. 53% is traveling more often. For 30% cycling promotion by the employer contributed to the change in travel behaviour. Change of function of working place also play a role. 68% say the cycling route has played an important role in the behaviour change. 9% of the cyclists (18) travelled by car before. These people travel by car 2,2 trips a week less during peak hours.

Lessons Learned show_help

Too high estimate of the effect and too short time between the opening of the route and the effect measurement (3 months).

Project measures and effects

Show all details
Modal Split show_help
Change of car-users: not available
Show details
No modal split data has been specified for this project
Mileage Effect show_help
Long-term change of car usage: not available
Show details
The data of this project is insufficient for calculating the mileage effect.
Emission effect show_help
Emission effect (in total): not available
Show details
The data of this project is insufficient for calculating the emission effect.
Project Promotion Activity show_help
0 occasions
Show details
No Data has been specified here.
Services, Mobility Options and Effects show_help
 
Show details
  Number of people Target Group
Comment on the targets in level B-D:

B: 77% van de fietsers heeft een goed beeld van de maatregel. 15% heeft iets gehoord of gelezen over de verbetering. Ruim 90% zegt dat de werkgever geen aandacht heeft besteed aan de nieuwe route.

D: 24% vindt de informatie over de nieuwe route (ruim) voldoende, 18% vindt de informatie (ruim) onvoldoende. 32% heeft geen behoefte aan informatie.

/

B: 77% of the cyclists has a clear view of the measure. 15% has heard of read about the improvement. Over 90% says that their employer didn't pay attention to the new route.

D: 24% is (highly) satisfied with the information about the new route, 18% is (highly) dissatisfied. 32% has no need for information.
E. Acceptance 222 %
Comment on the targets in level E-G:

E: 222 fietsers geteld in de ochtendspits op 14 oktober 2014

G: Fietsers waarderen de route met een 7,9. Vooral de directheid scoort hoog. De sociale veiligheid en vertraging bij verkeerslichten scoren lager, maar wel voldoende. 95% ziet de route als een verbetering (52% sterke verbetering)

/

E: 222 cyclists counted during the morning peak hour of 14th October 2014

G: Cyclists score the route with 7,9. Mainly the directness of the route is valued high. Social security and delay at traffic lights score lower, but still sufficient. 95% find the route is an improvement (52% strong improvement)
H. Long-term attitudes and behaviour 18 %
Description of reached system effects:

49% has chosen a new cycling route; 30% hardly altered its cycling route. 53% is traveling more often. For 30% cycling promotion by the employer contributed to the change in travel behaviour. Change of function of working place also play a role. 68% say the cycling route has played an important role in the behaviour change. 9% of the cyclists (18) travelled by car before. These people travel by car 2,2 trips a week less during peak hours.
Lessons Learned:

Too high estimate of the effect and too short time between the opening of the route and the effect measurement (3 months).
Services Provided show_help
 
Show details
No Data has been specified here.
Overall Targets show_help
 
Show details
No Data has been specified here.
External Factors show_help
 
Show details
No Data has been specified here.